Labour Leadership

Well, that was a waste of a post-it note and some ink:

Labour Results

And it should be interesting too.

I’m not sure why I jotted the initials down in that order, but as may be guessed from the “2” and the “3” it was before the results began to be read out. It’s nice to see that Liz Kendall dropping out would have made such a difference.

As far as Corbyn’s Tory opponent in 2020 is concerned, it should be remembered Cameron won’t be there and that hardly anyone had heard of John Major in 1987. (Also, anyone panicking about the unstable situation in the Middle East can reflect that in 1935 it was a reasonable expectation that an election would take place in 1940.)

Fortunately I have already taken suitable precautions regarding this possible Labour leadership outcome.

___…___

On a different note, would the BBC please choloform the Radio 4 continuity announcer/ interviewer during the next Labour Party leadership announcement. I can then listen to it in peace and, indeed, hear the Liz Kendall result.

(Happily my maths is good enough to round off the other figures, add up 60+20+20 and then subtract as required.)

Advertisements

One thought on “Labour Leadership

  1. gawainsmum September 13, 2015 / 20:55

    Now we all want to know what your ‘suitable precautions’ are!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s